Glean the Gleaner



  • Web lasvegasgleaner.com
Blog powered by TypePad

« On wimping out: Toward a more holistic view | Main | Reid unveils August talking points »

08/03/2009

Comments

Maybe the swordsman shares in the funnymentalust for Sarah, Sarah.

Johnny Casino really is clueless. Does he really think he can get away with all of this just 'cuz Goddy McGod "chose him to be great"? Is he delusional, narcissistic, or both?

Atdleft...for answers read The Family, be sure to have a barf bag at the ready.

Knowing what we now know, we now know that the Republican senators knew what Ensign was doing last Summer and before and that long term never ending infidelity of his may be why his fellow Republican Senators didn't donate any money to help him in his role as chair of the NRSC.

I really hope voters wake up in '12 and see whatta useless, dishonest and morally bankrupt POS Hairdo is. At least we won't have to be sickened by the RJ's apologist editorials for this scumbag any longer -- think of how great that will be!

Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., said Tuesday he was joining the majority of his party in voting "no," saying she hadn't given enough assurances about her position on the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. During her confirmation hearings, Sotomayor refused to say the amendment limited state as well as federal actions — a question on which the high court has yet to rule.

It is not surprising that Senator John Ensign the morally challenged champion of the Party of No is opposing the nomination of Judge Sotomayor. It is even more disingenuous that this above stated reason is the basis for Ensign to oppose Judge Sotomayor. To comment on this particular position because it is an issue to yet go before the Court. It would be improper for Judge Sotomayor to state her position. But we know that our Senator is ethically challenged and grasps at excuses to support his party of no. I am asking that you contact his office in Washington D.C. 202-224 6244 and Las Vegas 388-6605and indicate that you do not support his decision to oppose Judge Sotomayor. If you are so inclined you can also say you support that his financial dealings regarding his affair needs to be investigated. A few weeks ago I indicated to his office that I believed he should resign because it disturbed me that his internal poll indicated that people believed he should not resign.

Vicenta Montoya

The facts: Of course Slanker knew! His nose is so up Ensign's ass, it would be impossible for him to not know! The real question is will Slanker admit he knows of any others...???

Other facts: Voting against Sotomayor may be the douchiest vote by a Nevada Senator in the history of our fine State. I'll have to go back and check for sure.

If you Google "douchiest Nevada and Senator" there are a lot of hits....

The comments to this entry are closed.

* * * * *

Network ads


Get Gleaner updates

  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

Donations