Miniglean

• Barack Obama would make a crappy president so naturally Nevada Democrats should vote for him, twisted and perverse local newspaper says. LVRJ
• Hillary and Bill Clinton have always pretended that they would be the editor/owner's friends even if he hadn't helped raise oodles for their campaigns over the years, so Nevada Democrats should vote for her, other local newspaper says. Sun
• NV caucus is "a throw of the dice," says WSJ
• NV Caucus is "beyond 'showgirls and slot machines,'" says Newsweek.
• You know how everybody says "What happens here stays here" doesn't apply to the Nevada caucus? Does too. American Prospect

Comments

[Kickboxermomma]

LVRJ-just more insulting crap.(I say boycott the LVRJ and get your news from them on line or at your local library. Refuse to pay for that rag.)Sun- what a disappointing editorial. No substance. Go out, caucus. I think any one of the three would make a good president. Once the nominanee is clear let's deliver Nevada in the blue column top to bottom. WH, CD3, Senate, Assembly, judgeships. (I know they are NP but Dems are running to be judge and we need to start supporting them.)

[Michael Green]

An R-J editorial endorsing Obama is the best news possible for the other Democrats!

[MikeZ]

I just got pushed polled by Hillary's people, disgraceful stuff.

She hit both OB and JE

Company called Synergy Advantage @ 218.589.7586, if you'd like to call them to complain.

I will give this company credit for identifying itself on Caller ID as FTC requires...few do that.

[Bored]

I agree, what a goddamn rag the R-J is. Good God, how obtuse and idiotic can their editorials get with their pseudo-Limbaugh rantings.

"Yeah, we're Arkies at heart and we hate/loath/resent/vomit over outselves about Hillary Clinton; John Edwards is not good for capitalism, so vote for the Obama guy even though he's vague about 'change.'"

Nothing even remotely positive about their hated Democrats, the other major party that governs America. They've got more nice things to say about the Taliban.

So which of the GOP dopes in the running will the bathroom wall heroes at the R-J go with? Are they ready to do so? I don't think they are.

--Their Favorite Son Mike Huckabee, who believes in Creationism over science? Considering the intelligence level in the R-J editorial offices, THAT would figure.

--Mitt Romney, the phoniest man in show business? But at the R-J, phoniness is a virtue: just read any column by Sherman Frederick.

--John McCain -- no they wouldn't, not "conservative" enough. Besides, one of his arms doesn't work right. Someone who doesn't have two arms that work right can't beat the Democrats.

--Rudy Giuliani -- MAYBE they would, pro-choice, pro-gun control, pro-gay rights, pro-illegal immigrant, pro-adultery as he is, simply because he can maybe beat Hillary, and the R-J has no real principles anyway. In the 18th Century, their editorial writers would be well-poisoners.

Oh Boy, I can't WAIT until the R-J comes out with whom they are endorsing among that sorry-arse crew of Republicans!! What a pathetically hilarious read that will be.

[What?!]

Stephens Mdia/Group/Empire is biggest contributor to Huckabee....also, one of their reporters already did a positive piece on him a month ago. Let's see how much sway Sherm and Tom have.

[Duane Dixon]

Hillary using push polls - Well I will be god damned she will stoop as low as the Republicans or mabey she just is one.

Hey Dems if you want a winner -

GO EDWARDS!!!!!!!

[The Penguin]

The best way around any poll, push or otherwise, is simply not to answer the phone if Caller ID can't tell you who it is or if the area code is unfamiliar. Kinda like the R-J calling to get you to subscribe.

BTW, Bored -- did the R-J endorse Dole back in '96? He had a hand that didn't work right. They'll diss McCain simply because he's not right(wing) enough to their liking, bum arm be damned.

R-J picks Romney!