OK, let's hope this puts to rest once and for all any doubt about whether Sean Hannity is a representative member in good standing of contemporary mainstream American media:
Meantime, apparently the Review-Journal has sent an e-mail to subscribers saying that it's poll published Friday will show Clinton leading Obama by nine in Nevada (Flash). A couple thoughts:
First, while it makes sense in retrospect, we'd never really thought about it before — it may be that Jon Ralston is the only person the Gleaner knows who actually has a subscription to the Review-Journal.
Second, well, whew! Glad that's settled. Now instead of actually participating, people can just sit back and let polling and the conventional media storyline determine who wins. Just like New Hampshire.
People don't pay attention to polls, they pay attention to what they feel in their hearts.
Posted by: KidFromVegas | 01/17/2008 at 12:46 PM
Sorry, Gleaner. Two. I subscribe, but only because I have to. Also, we have this litter box ....
Posted by: Michael Green | 01/17/2008 at 12:56 PM
This "Sean Hannity" of whom you speak -- who or what is he? Is he of this planet? Is he of our species? How frequent are his sightings? I know not this "Sean Hannity" nor his ways and mores. Please, someone, explain.
Posted by: The Penguin | 01/17/2008 at 02:22 PM
GO JOHN GO!
Now if all those handraisers will go caucus!
Posted by: | 01/17/2008 at 03:21 PM
My garbage can subscribes to the RJ...it's garbage and it belongs there.
Posted by: Rich S | 01/18/2008 at 09:50 AM