« Daily Glean: Area Romney supporters as excited as gambling addicts | Main | Adelson runs attack ads against Porter »

08/21/2007

Comments

There will be plenty to make fun of whether they choose Willard or Julie-Annie because both bozos have made lots of gaffes and flip-flops. Let's just hope that this time the Dems use it as effectively as has been done by the rethugs in past election cycles.

Captain Underpants strikes again!

We expect Mitt the Magic Mormon from Mammon to lie about this stuff because that's what he does. But what amazes me is the number of people who still think Kenny Guinn wasn't just as big a liar when he shoved George W. Bush up our asses in 2000.

Mitt paid roughly $800 for every vote he recieved in Iowa (see link: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070812080339AA3N9PH).

With performances like this one, Mitt 'Aw Shucks' Romney may have to spend even more to get anyone to take him seriously. Iowans should have held out for more.

Make no mistake about it, Nevada Republicans are as dumb as they come, and they will oppose the dump, listen to the same double talk on Yucca (recall the "sound science" remark from Dick Cheney in No. Nev. in 2000 was all they needed to vote for Bush/Cheney twice) this time round, and vote for Romney anyway.

Yucca will be an issue that an effective Democrat nominee could hammer Romney against in Nevada next year. For Democrats and Independents, that is, because GOP voters won't care if their nominee is for it or avoids it, as Romney has done.

Certainly, there's been enough "research" on Yucca already, and Guinn himself is losing whatever credibility he once had condoning Romney's obvious avoidance of the issue. Romney is for sure a supply-sider when it comes to the nuclear power industry.

Anonymous at 6:37, that would be fine, except that the dumb fucks in Nevada still voted for Bush in 2000 and 2004. Not by much, but enough.

After the caucus, if the Democratic party in NV isn't organized enough to beat a Republican prez canidate, then I am moving back to California.

Pedro, I'd be with you, but let's face facts. Democrats can count on urban Las Vegas and Reno. In suburbs of Las Vegas and Reno, you've got idiots who think Republicans are their salvation against taxes. In the cow counties, you have gun-toting neanderthals who think Democrats will break into their homes to take their guns and build the Great Wall of China around every piece of grass to keep out the sheep, which they would let overgraze this into another Dust Bowl. I think we can win, but it'd be tough any which way, thanks to the morons we share the state with.

this state is unlike utah, they have the mormon tabernacle choir...nevada has the moron tab and apple choir..what a bunch of toothless loser rubes. this state is corrupt from the bottom feeders up.
why isn't the environment the front burner issue? without air and water we don't live. duh.

Keeping: Not that you're generalizing or anything...

Mitt's real name is not Mitt. What his network of evil bishops did to the american women and children at the mountain meadows murders, was more than historical it was histarical. Did his family have to leave America for Mexico because of this?

BELOW IS HOW THE MORMANS SUGAR COAT THE MURDERS.

Richard E. Turley Jr., “The Mountain Meadows Massacre,” Ensign, Sep 2007, 14-21

This month marks the 150th anniversary of a terrible episode in the history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. On September 11, 1857, some 50 to 60 local militiamen in southern Utah, aided by American Indian allies, massacred about 120 emigrants who were traveling by wagon to California. The horrific crime, which spared only 17 children age six and under, occurred in a highland valley called the Mountain Meadows, roughly 35 miles southwest of Cedar City. The victims, most of them from Arkansas, were on their way to California with dreams of a bright future.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Glean the Gleaner



  • Web lasvegasgleaner.com