After inspiring a few dozen key volunteers into a veritable frenzy of polite applause during a Tuesday afternoon visit to Las Vegas, Willard Milton Romney turned his firing-on-all-cylinders campaign to the urgent task of charming the local press corps.
After some typically stupid questions from the TV people, the AP's Kathleen Hennessey started off the fun part by basically asking Willard if he planned on taking a position on the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste dump during the course of any of our lifetimes.
"I would make sure that in no circumstances would we do something that would put the health and the well-being of Nevadans at risk. And this is a matter that is being currently studied and reviewed. We'll want to see what the results of that review are," Romney hemmed and hawed (Hemney? Hawmney?). Then he said that he hates the federal government because he's a Republican. More or less. But then he said that he doesn't hate it so much that he'll stop it from forcing nukes up Nevada's patootie. "Clearly Nevadans have a lot to say with regards to this and other policies. And if something looks, uh, we're going to await the results of the work that is now being carried out."
As it happens, Kenny Guinn, the last credible, sane and emotionally stable person to hold the office of Nevada governor, is a Romney supporter. In fact, Guinn was at Romney's side while the Magic Mormon met the media. And as Romney equivocated and scrambled to fill the air with words that someone might mistake for an answer to Hennessey's question, well, maybe it was just us, be we could have sworn we saw Guinn wincing once or twice. Next thing we know, a voice, that turned out to be the lowly Gleaner's, was blurting, "Governor Guinn is that good enough for the people of Nevada?"
"Absolutely," Guinn said, demonstrating that he's just as eager to apologize for his party ramming nuclear waste down the state's throat today as he was during two Karl Rove campaigns for George W. Bush. "I know the data he's going to be looking at will give him the basis on which he can make a decision that we will be very proud of," Guinn said.
Hennessey, thankfully undeterred by Gleaner's impertinent interruption, pressed ahead, asking Romney "you do plan on taking a position during the campaign?"
"Um, I already have. I just described my position. I may pursue that even further," said a now nervous-looking Romney.
"It sounds like you said you're going to look at the research," Hennessey said.
"Well my position is that I'm not going to do anything that would put the health or well being of Nevadans at risk," said a now clearly frazzled Romney, dashing to wrap himself up in the comfort of his (poorly and inadequately) prepared Yucca sound bites.
At this point, the R-J's Molly Ball weighed in with the interrogatory equivalent of a short jab to Romney's strikingly handsome lantern jaw: "But you're not ruling it out. The dump."
"Uh, it's something that I'm going to look at further," Romney said, reeling. "As the, as the, uh, results of the, um, study that's ongoing (pause) are (pause) provided."
Then one of the TV people asked Romney if all the Mormons were going to vote for him, or something like that, which turned out to be the last question. Willard Milton visibly relaxed, and a delivery that had been growing increasingly pained and tentative resumed some measure of confidence, as for once he found he preferred talking about the Mormon thing to what else had been on the table.
And why not? He's got a position on the Mormon thing.
Nevada War Party voters, being industry suck-ups who support big bidness at every opportunity and typically look at the environmental ethic as something to scorn in derision, preferably by repeating something cute that Rush said, probably don't care about Romney's specific position on Yucca Mountain.
But Romney's scrambling on Yucca is of a piece. There's Romney the great white hunter. And Romney who attacked Barack Obama for advocating a sex education policy that Romney himself supported. And the fighting Romneys, battling the evildoers on the campaign trail, presumably so we don't have to fight them at home. And a slew of as yet mostly unpublicized gaffes as governor. And the Romney who stumbles over the one issue that every presidential campaign should have in the can before they let their candidate put one expensively manicured pedicured and elegantly shod foot in the state.
If the War Party wants to go with Willard, fine. It'll be delightful to make fun of them when they're all whining and wringing their hands over the discovery that their presidential-looking guy's magnificent jaw is made o' glass.
There will be plenty to make fun of whether they choose Willard or Julie-Annie because both bozos have made lots of gaffes and flip-flops. Let's just hope that this time the Dems use it as effectively as has been done by the rethugs in past election cycles.
Posted by: Obiter Dicta | 08/21/2007 at 04:23 PM
Captain Underpants strikes again!
Posted by: Nevada Scandalmonger | 08/21/2007 at 04:37 PM
We expect Mitt the Magic Mormon from Mammon to lie about this stuff because that's what he does. But what amazes me is the number of people who still think Kenny Guinn wasn't just as big a liar when he shoved George W. Bush up our asses in 2000.
Posted by: Keeping Them Honest | 08/21/2007 at 05:12 PM
Mitt paid roughly $800 for every vote he recieved in Iowa (see link: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070812080339AA3N9PH).
With performances like this one, Mitt 'Aw Shucks' Romney may have to spend even more to get anyone to take him seriously. Iowans should have held out for more.
Posted by: Patrick | 08/21/2007 at 05:59 PM
Make no mistake about it, Nevada Republicans are as dumb as they come, and they will oppose the dump, listen to the same double talk on Yucca (recall the "sound science" remark from Dick Cheney in No. Nev. in 2000 was all they needed to vote for Bush/Cheney twice) this time round, and vote for Romney anyway.
Yucca will be an issue that an effective Democrat nominee could hammer Romney against in Nevada next year. For Democrats and Independents, that is, because GOP voters won't care if their nominee is for it or avoids it, as Romney has done.
Certainly, there's been enough "research" on Yucca already, and Guinn himself is losing whatever credibility he once had condoning Romney's obvious avoidance of the issue. Romney is for sure a supply-sider when it comes to the nuclear power industry.
Posted by: | 08/21/2007 at 06:37 PM
Anonymous at 6:37, that would be fine, except that the dumb fucks in Nevada still voted for Bush in 2000 and 2004. Not by much, but enough.
Posted by: Keeping Them Honest | 08/21/2007 at 09:25 PM
After the caucus, if the Democratic party in NV isn't organized enough to beat a Republican prez canidate, then I am moving back to California.
Posted by: Pedro | 08/22/2007 at 07:42 AM
Pedro, I'd be with you, but let's face facts. Democrats can count on urban Las Vegas and Reno. In suburbs of Las Vegas and Reno, you've got idiots who think Republicans are their salvation against taxes. In the cow counties, you have gun-toting neanderthals who think Democrats will break into their homes to take their guns and build the Great Wall of China around every piece of grass to keep out the sheep, which they would let overgraze this into another Dust Bowl. I think we can win, but it'd be tough any which way, thanks to the morons we share the state with.
Posted by: Keeping Them Honest | 08/22/2007 at 07:58 AM
this state is unlike utah, they have the mormon tabernacle choir...nevada has the moron tab and apple choir..what a bunch of toothless loser rubes. this state is corrupt from the bottom feeders up.
why isn't the environment the front burner issue? without air and water we don't live. duh.
Posted by: Jaded | 08/22/2007 at 08:40 AM
Keeping: Not that you're generalizing or anything...
Posted by: The Penguin | 08/23/2007 at 10:33 AM
Mitt's real name is not Mitt. What his network of evil bishops did to the american women and children at the mountain meadows murders, was more than historical it was histarical. Did his family have to leave America for Mexico because of this?
BELOW IS HOW THE MORMANS SUGAR COAT THE MURDERS.
Richard E. Turley Jr., “The Mountain Meadows Massacre,” Ensign, Sep 2007, 14-21
This month marks the 150th anniversary of a terrible episode in the history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. On September 11, 1857, some 50 to 60 local militiamen in southern Utah, aided by American Indian allies, massacred about 120 emigrants who were traveling by wagon to California. The horrific crime, which spared only 17 children age six and under, occurred in a highland valley called the Mountain Meadows, roughly 35 miles southwest of Cedar City. The victims, most of them from Arkansas, were on their way to California with dreams of a bright future.
Posted by: carl john wall | 12/16/2007 at 08:46 AM